- Netter News
- Posts
- Campa-Najjar Caught on Video, Mike Netter's 30M+ Views, Newsom's Spin Job, DOJ Investigating California, and More...
Campa-Najjar Caught on Video, Mike Netter's 30M+ Views, Newsom's Spin Job, DOJ Investigating California, and More...
Do read these stories and posts and tell us what gets you OUTRAGED the most (and what makes you smile)!
Email comments directly to [email protected]
First off… The Big News 👇
BREAKING NEWS
Campa-Najjar Caught on Video: ‘Pare Down’ ICE Enforcement as Criminals Threaten Americans
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:
Ammar Campa‑Najjar, a Democratic candidate running again for California’s 48th Congressional District against Rep. Darrell Issa, was recorded at a candidate forum stating that if elected he would seek to “pare down,” not expand, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Homeland Security.
He argued there is a “strong argument” that ICE and DHS are doing more than they should, and indicated he believes enforcement should be reduced.
His comments align with broader positions of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which has opposed new funding for immigration enforcement unless there are “meaningful and significant reforms” to how it operates.
On social media, Campa‑Najjar also called for the resignation of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem following a high‑profile incident in Minnesota involving an ICE agent, saying he was “gravely concerned” about escalation of violence and urging federal enforcement to defer to local law enforcement.
Critics, including campaign opponents, seized on his statement as evidence that he supports weakening federal immigration enforcement even amid public safety concerns.
The episode reflects ongoing national debates over immigration policy and the role of federal agencies in enforcement.
This Post by Mike Netter Got 30 million views!👇
And Karoline Leavitt even Retweeted it!👇
And by Dan Bongino! 👇
And Was Featured on Fox News! 👇
All Volume, No Content Eric Swalwell Vows to Revoke ICE officers’ Driver’s Licenses
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:
California congressional candidate Eric Swalwell, running for governor, publicly stated at a campaign forum that if elected, he would pursue policies to revoke the driver’s licenses of federal ICE officers.
Swalwell said federal immigration agents would “lose their immunity” and no longer be eligible to drive legally in the state as part of a broader stance criticizing ICE enforcement tactics and advocating for local prosecution of actions he views as misconduct.
His remarks stood in contrast to California’s existing policy, which already grants driver’s licenses to undocumented immigrants, creating a controversial policy juxtaposition.
Swalwell also pledged to direct local law enforcement to pursue charges against ICE officers for alleged crimes such as battery or false imprisonment.
Critics seized on his comments as evidence of hostility to federal law enforcement and raised questions about the legality of a state limiting basic privileges like driving for federal agents.
The exchange has become a flashpoint in the gubernatorial campaign and highlights broader debates over immigration enforcement and state versus federal authority.
Newsom Takes Credit for Benicia Refinery Delay, But California Still Has No Energy Plan
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:
Governor Gavin Newsom publicly praised the announcement that the Valero oil refinery in Benicia will delay permanent closure, framing it as a success for California’s energy policy.
However, critics argue that this “victory” is overstated because the delay does not guarantee long‑term energy stability and leaves underlying supply issues unresolved.
The refinery’s continued operation was contingent on market conditions and investments already planned by Valero, not a direct result of state leadership or intervention.
Observers contend that California’s broader energy policies, including aggressive emissions mandates and regulatory burdens, are a key factor driving refinery closures and production declines.
By congratulating himself for a delay rather than addressing systemic issues, the governor is seen as deflecting from ongoing energy challenges facing residents and businesses.
Ultimately, the framing of the Benicia news as a policy win is criticized as political posturing rather than a substantive improvement to California’s energy landscape.
Newsom’s Spin Job: Rewriting California’s Failures as Wins
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:
Governor Gavin Newsom is attempting to reshape the narrative around California’s record by highlighting selective accomplishments amid myriad challenges facing the state.
Despite persistent issues such as high living costs, homelessness, and an ongoing exodus of residents and businesses, Newsom’s messaging emphasizes optimism and resilience, aiming to shift public focus toward successes like budget surpluses and environmental goals.
Critics argue that this effort amounts to political spin rather than meaningful governance, noting that achievements touted by the governor do not offset broader structural problems or improve everyday life for many Californians.
The article notes that Newsom faces difficulty reconciling his national ambitions with voters’ dissatisfaction at home, creating a tension between image management and policy outcomes.
It also highlights that opposition voices and media scrutiny are increasingly focused on tangible failures rather than rhetorical victories.
Overall, the piece frames Newsom’s communication strategy as an uphill effort to counteract deep‑seated concerns about California’s economic, social, and political trajectory.
California Republicans File Emergency Application Challenging Prop. 50
Opinion Piece: The Disunited States of America
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:
The United States is described as increasingly fragmented, with different regions and jurisdictions operating under conflicting legal interpretations and loyalties, undermining a shared legal reality.
Rather than physical warfare, the piece argues that the country is experiencing a form of civil conflict fought through legal nullification, selective enforcement, bureaucratic obstruction, and ideological division.
This division manifests in situations where federal laws are vigorously enforced in some places and openly ignored or obstructed in others, creating competing systems of authority.
The writer sees this breakdown of national cohesion as a threat to the rule of law and democratic legitimacy, comparing the current dynamic to the pre‑Civil War era when states refused to enforce certain federal mandates.
Deep ideological splits over issues such as immigration, federal authority, and identity politics are said to fuel a growing distrust of institutions and erode consensus on fundamental governance.
The result, the piece concludes, is a nation that still functions under a common flag but lacks a unified legal and moral framework, increasing the risk of further destabilization.
Petition to Save Prop 13 Making Progress
Click below to get petition:
DON’T FORGET THIS PETITION
School Choice (CEO ACT) 17,000 a year is put in an account for each student & would be put in an education savings account for TK through 12.Any leftover money can be used for college or trade school.
DOJ Investigates California for Possible Discrimination Against Female Athletes
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:
The Trump administration is investigating allegations that California’s policies allowing transgender athletes to compete in girls’ sports may violate federal anti‑discrimination laws, including Title IX, which prohibits sex‑based discrimination in education programs receiving federal funds.
The U.S. Department of Justice has sent a civil rights probe letter to California officials, seeking detailed information about how the state’s policies are implemented and enforced.
The investigation focuses on whether transgender participation undermines fair competition and the rights of female athletes in schools, colleges, and athletic programs.
California’s current rules allow students to compete based on gender identity rather than biological sex, a practice critics argue gives an unfair advantage and harms female athletes’ opportunities.
Supporters of the state’s approach maintain it is intended to be inclusive, but federal authorities are examining whether it conflicts with established protections for women and girls under federal law.
The inquiry underscores ongoing national tensions between gender identity policies and long‑standing legal frameworks designed to protect equal opportunity in sports.
New Tool Shows California Policies Add $35,000 to Annual Cost of Living
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:
A new tax calculator illustrates how Democratic‑led policies in California could add roughly $35,000 per year to the average resident’s cost of living when accounting for taxes, fees, mandates, and increased regulations.
The tool aggregates state and local tax burdens — including income, sales, property, and special assessments — to show how much more Californians pay compared with residents of lower‑tax states.
According to the analysis tied to the calculator’s output, middle‑income households in California face significantly higher overall tax and cost pressures that are not always transparent in annual budget discussions.
The comparison underscores how cumulative policy decisions — beyond just headline tax rates — can translate into substantial financial strain on families and workers.
Supporters of the measure argue that higher taxes fund public services, but critics point to economic migration and business departures as evidence that the cost burden is driving people out.
The broader narrative presented connects higher living expenses not only to explicit tax rates but also to regulatory costs embedded in everyday consumer prices.
Guest Column
Venezuela and California: Brothers from Another Mother
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:
California’s political and economic trajectory is compared to Venezuela’s long‑running crisis, focusing on governance structures where power centralizes and accountability weakens, rather than on overt authoritarian control.
In both places, one dominant political coalition controls key branches of government and institutions, reducing competition and oversight.
In California, critics point to resistance to voter ID requirements as an example of weakened electoral accountability, contrasting with allegations of election manipulation in Venezuela’s 2024 vote.
Policy outcomes in California — such as housing shortages, homelessness growth, infrastructure degradation, higher energy costs, and declining public safety — are framed as consequences of that entrenched political dominance.
The piece argues that regulatory, tax, and environmental policies have discouraged production in industries like agriculture, contributing to business departures and eroded capacity, similar to Venezuela’s loss of private production.
Ultimately, it emphasizes that without meaningful structural change, California risks repeating patterns of economic fragility and dependency that preceded Venezuela’s deeper collapse.
No matter where you are Thursday… tune in here!
The underbelly of California politics turned inside out this week.
GO CALIFORNIA with @taxfighter7 @nettermike and KURT on CFR.
Follow Mike Netter and connect to WATCH our VODCAST
Help to take back California to get rid of the inept and root out the evil.
Small donations make a large impact.
Spread the word! Share Netter News with your family & friends.
Reply